Details, Fiction and fishing expedition case law
Details, Fiction and fishing expedition case law
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
Case regulation is specific on the jurisdiction in which it was rendered. For example, a ruling in a California appellate court would not ordinarily be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
In addition, it addresses the limitation period under Article 91 and one hundred twenty of your Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to seek cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. Additionally they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi models, with non-compliance dealing with departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, They are really directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. 12. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more
145 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of your Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and within the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
From the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court is definitely the highest court during the United States. Decreased courts over the federal level consist of the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, and also the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts hear cases involving matters related to the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that involve parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Each state has its have judicial system that incorporates trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Just about every state is frequently referred to given that the “supreme” court, Despite the fact that there are some exceptions to this rule, for example, the Big apple Court of Appeals or maybe the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally listen to cases involving state constitutional matters, state regulation and regulations, Even though state read more courts can also generally listen to cases involving federal laws.
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. twelve. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons having their character above board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to your Government service could be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to carry out absent with the candidature on the petitioner. Read more
The DCFS social worker in charge of your boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, As well as in her 6-thirty day period report into the court, the worker elaborated over the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Touching on the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 from the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice isn't served, the grievance petition is usually dismissed. This is because service of your grievance notice can be a mandatory need and a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The legislation calls for that a grievance notice be served on the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In case the employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) Should the organization is transprovincial.
12 . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair on the offender as well as Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts but they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe as a foster child. Even though the pair had two youthful children of their possess at home, the social worker didn't convey to them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report towards the court the following working day, the worker reported the boy’s placement in the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the couple experienced young children.
8. For that reasons stated previously mentioned, this court finds the petition being without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend from the comments, and their request is Consequently acceded to. All pending applications, if any, are dismissed. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, Additionally it is a nicely-founded proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is topic to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.